The first thing I remember is the smell of wet stone.
Not temple at first. Not even faith. Just stone, darkened by rain, warmed by oil lamps and carrying that faint metallic scent that comes only in places where water and belief have been meeting for centuries.
I grew up in Guwahati, and like most things there, Kamakhya was not introduced to me. It was absorbed.
The hill was always there, half-hidden in cloud. The stories were always there too, half-whispered, half-assumed. That this is where Mother Sati’s yoni fell. That the earth itself became feminine there. That the Goddess bleeds once a year and the temple closes, not in mourning, but in respect.
As a child, you don’t question that kind of thing. You just learn that the world has places where it behaves differently.
And Kamakhya is one of them.
During Ambubachi, the city changes. It is not a festival in the usual sense. It feels more like an agreement between people and something larger than them. The temple gates close, but the hill does not become empty. It becomes fuller in a strange way, sadhus sitting under plastic sheets, women carrying red cloth bundles, men chanting softly as if sound itself has to be careful not to disturb something resting.
Even the rain feels slower.
I remember once standing there with no real plan, just following the movement of people. Someone nearby was chanting Devi Mahatmyam, and another group was singing something I didn’t recognise, but the rhythm was familiar anyway. Everything felt like it was circling around a silence at the centre of the hill.
During my study, I asked my Guru, Jayashankar Rajagopalan, over WhatsApp, about Chengannur where a similar ritual is followed and expressed my desire to visit there.
Years later, he invited me to Kerala, “I will fulfill your wish to go to the kshetra of the menstruating Bhagavati in Chengannur.”
***
Kerala arrived like a different kind of green.
Not the dense, almost wet green of Assam, but something more arranged. Palms standing apart like they had chosen their distance carefully. Houses with sloping roofs that seemed permanently prepared for rain. Even the air felt less chaotic.
Chengannur is not a place that tries to impress you. If anything, it hides its weight under ordinariness.
The temple, Chengannur Mahadeva Temple, does not announce itself loudly. You almost walk into it before realising you have arrived.
Inside, things feel older than language.
I had been told about it before coming. That here, the devi is believed to undergo her monthly cycle. That a white cloth placed in the sanctum is checked, and at certain times it is said to turn red. That during this period, the garbhagriha of the Bhagavathy closes.
I didn’t know how to hold that information at first.
Kamakhya I understood in fragments because I had grown up around it. But here, far away in Kerala, the same idea existed in a different accent, a different ritual grammar.
It unsettled something in me.
Not disbelief.
More like recognition without preparation.
***
On the day I visited, the sanctum sanctorum of the temple was not in its closing phase, but the atmosphere carried that possibility in it, like a sentence that knows its ending even when it hasn’t been spoken yet.
The priests moved with quiet efficiency. Nothing theatrical. Nothing rushed. Everything felt measured, as if time itself had been trained here.
I stood near the inner corridor for a while, just watching people come and go. Most did not speak much. Some touched the walls as they passed, not dramatically, just briefly, like checking if something was still there.
That gesture stayed with me.
Because it wasn’t devotion in the loud sense. It was familiarity.
What I had been told by my Guru began to make sense slowly.
Kamakhya in Assam belongs to a world that people often describe using big categories, Kaula, Vamachara, Tantra, the language of texts like the Kalika Purana and Yogini Tantra. But none of that really captures what it feels like on the ground.
What you actually see there is simpler: people accepting that divinity is not distant from the body.
That it can bleed. That it can rest. That it can withdraw.
In Kerala, the same idea arrives through a different discipline. The ritual system is more structured, shaped by traditions like the Tantrasamuchaya. Everything is cleaner, more codified, more contained. But underneath that order, the same imagination is alive.
That the Goddess is not static.
That she has cycles.
That the temple responds to them.
Two regions. Two languages. Two ritual architectures.
But something shared that is harder to name.
***
That evening, I saw a group of women seated near the temple courtyard.
They were singing the Lalita Sahasranama.
Not loudly. Not for performance.
Just steady repetition, like breath being given sound.
I don’t know how long I stood there. Time behaves differently in those spaces anyway. But at some point, I realised it reminded me of something I had heard in Kamakhya during Ambubachi, people sitting in loose circles chanting the Devi Mahatmya, voices mixing with rain, with drums, with silence between syllables.
The same feeling appeared again.
Not sameness of ritual.
But sameness of atmosphere.
A shared understanding that repetition is not emptiness. It is accumulation.
***
What struck me most between Kamakhya and Chengannur was not similarity in doctrine. It was similarity in tolerance for ambiguity.
Both places allow the Goddess to be in a state that is not permanent.
Not always present in the same way.
Not always “available” in the way modern thinking expects divinity, or even institutions, to be.
There is something deeply unmodern about that.
And maybe that is why it stays with you longer than explanations do.
***
When I left Chengannur, nothing felt concluded.
I didn’t feel like I had “understood” anything in a neat sense.
If anything, I had gathered a few impressions that refused to align into a single thought:
Rain hitting the roof of Kamakhya during Ambubachi.
The sound of women singing Lalita Sahasranama in Kerala dusk.
The idea of a closed sanctum that is not absence but rest.
And my Guru’s voice, quiet and certain: you will recognise something there.
I think I did.
Not as knowledge.
But as familiarity from somewhere deeper than explanation.
***
Some journeys don’t give answers.
They just return you to the same question in a slightly different form.
And sometimes, that is enough.
(The author is the editor-in-chief of On Record India.)